From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
Received: from buildserver.ru.mvista.com (unknown [85.21.88.6])
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750B3DDDEF
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 04:36:43 +1000 (EST)
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 22:36:41 +0400
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/2] QE Pin Multiplexing API
Message-ID: <20080925183641.GA20037@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251
Cc: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com>, Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
Reply-To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/options/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

Here is the sketch, only for RFC. It is tested to work, but there could be
silly thinkos anyway. I'll review the changes once again later...

Anyhow... David, is this approach looks ok? Or I'm hopeless..? ;-)

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2