From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:30:20 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Jeremy Kerr Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] sputrace : use marker_synchronize_unregister() Message-ID: <20080930113020.GE21367@elte.hu> References: <48E08B05.7030802@cn.fujitsu.com> <200809301028.21485.jk@ozlabs.org> <20080930095520.GB7557@elte.hu> <200809302122.36117.jk@ozlabs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200809302122.36117.jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers , Lai Jiangshan , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Steven Rostedt , Christoph Hellwig , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Andrew Morton , "Paul E. McKenney" , cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org, Peter Zijlstra List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , * Jeremy Kerr wrote: > Ingo, > > > that wont work very well as the patch relies on the new > > marker_synchronize_unregister() facility. > > d'oh, right you are. Should I leave this in your hands to merge? would be nice if you could give your Acked-by for the sputrace bits, then we can merge it. It's a oneliner so it shouldnt cause merging trouble in linux-next. Ingo