From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from metis.extern.pengutronix.de (metis.extern.pengutronix.de [83.236.181.26]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19F6DDE1A for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:33:54 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:33:46 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Grant Likely Subject: Re: Please pull 'next' branch of git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6-mpc52xx Message-ID: <20081014133346.GE23594@pengutronix.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vmttodhTwj0NAgWp" In-Reply-To: Cc: linuxppc-dev List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --vmttodhTwj0NAgWp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Grant, On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 02:02:41AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > Wolfram Sang (1): > powerpc/mpc5200: trivial printk-fixes in mpc52xx_common Thanks. What about these? :) http://oldpatchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc-embedded/patch?id=3D20188 (remove obsolete code from mpc52xx_phy) http://oldpatchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc-embedded/patch?id=3D20189 (simplify read/write in mpc52xx_phy) We use them for some time now and there are no bad side-effects. And to which tree did this one go? I couldn't find it on git.secretlab.ca. http://oldpatchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc-embedded/patch?id=3D20202 (don't touch pipelining) All the best, Wolfram --=20 Dipl.-Ing. Wolfram Sang | http://www.pengutronix.de Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry --vmttodhTwj0NAgWp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkj0n7kACgkQD27XaX1/VRuKzQCgyx6uuSDkLABnhawFJzSE1YtN 9hQAnA3kO4Ltqud3G9aDPmXMnWkRIVwv =keYr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vmttodhTwj0NAgWp--