From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, i2c@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add the of_find_i2c_device_by_node function
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 02:03:52 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081019220352.GA19539@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e4733910810191450t36cbe120y106d18f71cb3163b@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 05:50:15PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Anton Vorontsov
> <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com> wrote:
> > Hi Jon,
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:00:40AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> >> Add the of_find_i2c_device_by_node function. This allows you to follow
> >> a reference in the device tree to an i2c device node and then locate
> >> the linux device instantiated by the device tree. Example use, an i2s
> >> codec controlled by i2c. Depends on patch exporting i2c root bus symbol.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
> >
> > Few comments are below.
> >
> >> ---
> >> drivers/of/of_i2c.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >> 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/of/of_i2c.c b/drivers/of/of_i2c.c
> >> index 6a98dc8..ba7b394 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/of/of_i2c.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/of/of_i2c.c
> >> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
> >> void of_register_i2c_devices(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
> >> struct device_node *adap_node)
> >> {
> >> - void *result;
> >> + struct i2c_client *i2c_dev;
> >> struct device_node *node;
> >>
> >> for_each_child_of_node(adap_node, node) {
> >> @@ -41,18 +41,38 @@ void of_register_i2c_devices(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
> >>
> >> info.addr = *addr;
> >>
> >> - request_module(info.type);
> >> + request_module("%s", info.type);
> >
> > Patch description doesn't mention this change.
>
> Patches for this have been posted before by other people and they
> aren't making it in.
>
> This is the original mail....
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/13/290
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/12/8
> I can't find the ones patching i2c.
Well, I didn't disagree with the change. I think this is good change
(and good catch, btw).
Just mention it in the patch description (or better yet, you could send
a separate patch for this particular issue, it seems quite serious).
Thanks,
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-19 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-19 14:00 [PATCH] Add the of_find_i2c_device_by_node function Jon Smirl
2008-10-19 21:20 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-19 21:50 ` Jon Smirl
2008-10-19 22:03 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2008-10-20 5:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-10-21 0:23 Jon Smirl
2008-12-30 20:11 Jon Smirl
2009-01-06 16:29 ` Jon Smirl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081019220352.GA19539@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
--to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=i2c@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).