linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	devicetree-discuss list <devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org>,
	David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: GPIO - marking individual pins (not) available in device tree
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:01:28 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081024170128.GA20577@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081024164120.GA14350@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 08:41:20PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
[...]
> > So, how do we define in a bank of GPIOs, which ones are free for use, 
> > without them being attached to a device and given as a "gpios" property?
> >
> > Would we suggest a node;
> >
> > gpio-header {
> > 	compatible = "bplan,efika-gpio";
> > 	gpios = <&gpio-standard 16 0 17 0>;
> > };
> >
> > gpio-header2 {
> > 	compatible = "bplan,efika-gpio-wkup";
> > 	gpios = <&gpio-wkup 18 0>;
> > };
>
> IMO this looks very reasonable. You properly describe the hardware:
> physical device (header) and its resources.

If there are actually two headers, that is. If you use two nodes
just to specify which gpio is wkup, that is's a bit ugly... Why not

gpio-header {
	compatible = "bplan,<board>-gpio-header";
	gpios = <&standard 16 0
		 &standard 17 0
		 &wakeup 18 0>;
}

And the driver whould know that on this particular <board>
third gpio is the wakeup one?

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-24 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-23 21:32 GPIO - marking individual pins (not) available in device tree Matt Sealey
2008-10-23 22:22 ` Mitch Bradley
2008-10-23 23:05   ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-24  0:52     ` Mitch Bradley
2008-10-24  3:29       ` David Gibson
2008-10-24  4:17         ` Mitch Bradley
2008-10-24  4:45           ` David Gibson
2008-10-24 22:14             ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-26 23:47               ` David Gibson
2008-10-27 15:40                 ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-27 18:34                   ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-27 18:56                     ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-27 20:10                       ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-27 21:56                         ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-27 23:12                           ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-27 23:40                             ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-28  0:47                               ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-28  1:11                             ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-28  2:37                               ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-28 16:53                                 ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-28 17:39                                   ` Grant Likely
2008-10-28 19:46                                     ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-28  0:15                   ` David Gibson
2008-10-28  0:51                     ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-28  1:50                       ` David Gibson
2008-10-28  5:20                       ` Grant Likely
2008-10-24 22:03       ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-24 22:20         ` Stephen Neuendorffer
2008-10-26 21:39           ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-24 23:44         ` Mitch Bradley
2008-10-26 21:13           ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-26 23:53             ` David Gibson
2008-10-27 16:12               ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-27 16:35                 ` Scott Wood
2008-10-27 17:05                   ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-27 17:25                     ` Scott Wood
2008-10-27 17:49                       ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-27 17:54                         ` Scott Wood
2008-10-28  0:38                           ` David Gibson
2008-10-28  0:34                 ` David Gibson
2008-10-24  4:58     ` David Gibson
2008-10-24  3:27   ` David Gibson
2008-10-24 16:41 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-24 17:01   ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2008-10-24 22:17     ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-24 22:37       ` Anton Vorontsov
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-10-28 13:31 Konstantinos Margaritis
2008-10-28 14:11 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-28 14:15 ` Grant Likely
2008-10-28 17:06   ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-28 17:32     ` Grant Likely
2008-10-28 23:37 ` David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081024170128.GA20577@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
    --to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=matt@genesi-usa.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).