From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: paulus@samba.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: [patch] powerpc: rmp_wmb lwsync optimisation
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 14:05:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081101130534.GB32055@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081101123339.GA32055@wotan.suse.de>
smp_rmb can be lwsync if possible. Clarify the comment.
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
---
Index: linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h 2008-11-01 23:56:39.000000000 +1100
+++ linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h 2008-11-02 00:02:46.000000000 +1100
@@ -23,15 +23,17 @@
* read_barrier_depends() prevents data-dependent loads being reordered
* across this point (nop on PPC).
*
- * We have to use the sync instructions for mb(), since lwsync doesn't
- * order loads with respect to previous stores. Lwsync is fine for
- * rmb(), though. Note that rmb() actually uses a sync on 32-bit
- * architectures.
+ * *mb() variants without smp_ prefix must order all types of memory
+ * operations with one another. sync is the only instruction sufficient
+ * to do this.
*
- * For wmb(), we use sync since wmb is used in drivers to order
- * stores to system memory with respect to writes to the device.
- * However, smp_wmb() can be a lighter-weight lwsync or eieio barrier
- * on SMP since it is only used to order updates to system memory.
+ * For the smp_ barriers, ordering is for cacheable memory operations
+ * only. We have to use the sync instruction for smp_mb(), since lwsync
+ * doesn't order loads with respect to previous stores. Lwsync can be
+ * used for smp_rmb() and smp_wmb().
+ *
+ * However, on 32-bit, lwsync is actually just a sync, in which case smp_wmb()
+ * can be a lighter-weight eieio barrier.
*/
#define mb() __asm__ __volatile__ ("sync" : : : "memory")
#define rmb() __asm__ __volatile__ ("sync" : : : "memory")
@@ -51,7 +53,7 @@
#endif
#define smp_mb() mb()
-#define smp_rmb() rmb()
+#define smp_rmb() __asm__ __volatile__(LWSYNC_ON_SMP : : : "memory")
#define smp_wmb() __asm__ __volatile__ (__stringify(SMPWMB) : : :"memory")
#define smp_read_barrier_depends() read_barrier_depends()
#else
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-01 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-01 12:33 [patch] powerpc: smp_wmb lwsync optimisation fix Nick Piggin
2008-11-01 13:05 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2008-11-01 13:07 ` [rfc][patch] powerpc: replace isync with lwsync Nick Piggin
2008-11-03 5:32 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-11-03 8:31 ` Nick Piggin
2008-11-01 16:47 ` [patch] powerpc: smp_wmb lwsync optimisation fix Kumar Gala
2008-11-02 1:42 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081101130534.GB32055@wotan.suse.de \
--to=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).