From: Matthias Fuchs <matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Subject: Re: Connecting to "PCI command write" interrupt on 4xx platforms
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 21:32:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200811052132.31542.matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1225834184.8004.268.camel@pasglop>
Hi,=20
we build some 4xx based PMC modules in the past. These boards can
run as host ("processor PMC" or so called "monarch" mode) or as PCI endpoint
("non-monarch" mode). I would like to use the same DT (and kernel) in both=
=20
modes.
Currently I set the "status" property of the PCI node to "disabled" to prev=
ent=20
the kernel to do the host bride stuff (not good as I learned). But we need=
=20
some info from the PCI node even in endpoint mode. So disable is not the be=
st=20
idea.=20
In endpoint mode the current PCI node has many properties that
make no sense and others are missing. So one could think of a pci _and_=20
pci-endpoint node. The one that is not needed can be disabled, e.g. by=20
U-Boot (if you are using U-Boot :-).
I could live with a mode or empty endpoint property, but I am not sure how
to keep the endpoint interrupt properties side-by-side with the host
interrupt mapping. I do not want to patch multiple properties by the=20
bootloader to switch between host and endpoint. No can we have=20
interrupt-parent + interrupts property in the same node with=20
interrupt-map-mask + interrupt-map?
PCI0: pci@1ec000000 {
device_type =3D "pci";
endpoint; /* Ben's suggestion */
/* makes only sense for endpoints */
interrupt-parent =3D <&UIC0>;
interrupts =3D <0x5 0x4 /* PCI command write */
0x6 0x4>; /* PCI power management */
#interrupt-cells =3D <1>;
#size-cells =3D <2>;
#address-cells =3D <3>;
compatible =3D "ibm,plb440epx-pci", "ibm,plb-pci";
primary;
reg =3D <0x00000001 0xeec00000 0x00000008
0x00000001 0xeed00000 0x00000004
0x00000001 0xeed00000 0x00000004
0x00000001 0xef400000 0x00000040>;
/* makes some sense for endpoints=20
Values might differ between host and endpoints */
ranges =3D <...>;
/* makes some sense for endpoints */
dma-ranges =3D <...>;
interrupt-map-mask =3D <...>;
interrupt-map =3D <...>;
};
};
Matthias
On Tuesday 04 November 2008 22:29:44 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 12:17 +0100, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> > I must admit that I am not sure what you mean by (pci-endpoint)
> > _name_.
> > Do you mean something like this:
> >
> > PCI: pci@abc {
> > endpoint =3D "pci-endpoint";
> > ...
> >
> > To many "endpoint" appearances for my taste:-)
>
> No, by name I meant
>
> PCI: pci-endpoint@xxxx {
> }
>
> But if we want to have the same device node easily convert between
> endpoint and host, maybe simply a property would be enough. Either just
> an empty "endoint" property or a "mode" property containing "endpoint"
> vs. "host".
>
> I tend to prefer changing the name if we aren't going to be a host
> bridge though.
>
> Ben.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
=2D-=20
=2D------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dipl.-Ing. Matthias Fuchs
Head of System Design
esd electronic system design gmbh
Vahrenwalder Str. 207 - 30165 Hannover - GERMANY
Phone: +49-511-37298-0 - Fax: +49-511-37298-68
Please visit our homepage http://www.esd.eu
Quality Products - Made in Germany
=2D------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer: Klaus Detering, Dr. Werner Schulze
Amtsgericht Hannover HRB 51373 - VAT-ID DE 115672832
=2D------------------------------------------------------------------------
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-05 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-30 10:58 Connecting to "PCI command write" interrupt on 4xx platforms Matthias Fuchs
2008-10-30 20:15 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-11-03 9:10 ` Matthias Fuchs
2008-11-03 10:57 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-11-03 11:54 ` Stefan Roese
2008-11-03 13:40 ` Matthias Fuchs
2008-11-03 13:45 ` Matthias Fuchs
2008-11-03 20:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-11-04 5:19 ` Stefan Roese
2008-11-04 6:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-11-04 11:17 ` Matthias Fuchs
2008-11-04 21:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-11-05 20:32 ` Matthias Fuchs [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200811052132.31542.matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com \
--to=matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=sr@denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).