From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>,
David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb/fsl_qe_udc: Report disconnect before unbinding
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:59:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081112195916.GA31938@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0811121435310.16854-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 02:38:02PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>
> > Gadgets disable endpoints in their disconnect callbacks, so
> > we must call disconnect before unbinding. This also fixes
> > muram memory leak, since we free muram in the qe_ep_disable().
>
> > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_qe_udc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_qe_udc.c
> > @@ -2382,6 +2382,9 @@ int usb_gadget_unregister_driver(struct usb_gadget_driver *driver)
> > nuke(loop_ep, -ESHUTDOWN);
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&udc_controller->lock, flags);
> >
> > + /* report disconnect; the driver is already quiesced */
> > + driver->disconnect(&udc_controller->gadget);
> > +
> > /* unbind gadget and unhook driver. */
> > driver->unbind(&udc_controller->gadget);
> > udc_controller->gadget.dev.driver = NULL;
>
> Wouldn't it be better to do this before nuking the existing requests?
> The comment is wrong; the gadget driver is _not_ quiesced at this
> point. In fact the disconnect call is what quiesces the driver!
composite_unbind() says:
/* composite_disconnect() must already have been called
* by the underlying peripheral controller driver!
* so there's no i/o concurrency that could affect the
* state protected by cdev->lock.
*/
Which I read as "at disconnect time the controller should
already be disabled, no further i/o can happen". Which means
that we should nuke all pending requests and stop the
controller.
In this comment:
"/* report disconnect; the driver is already quiesced */"
"the driver" means "the udc driver", not the gadget driver.
FWIW, the PXA27x UDC controller also stops all activity and
completely disables the controller before calling the
disconnect().
> And wouldn't it be better to _skip_ doing this if the gadget wasn't
> connected before?
Composite framework handles this. If there were no connections,
then the disconnect() is a nop (except the spin lock/unlock pair).
I'm not sure how the controller driver could tell if there
was a connection or not: it doesn't operate these terms.
What the udc controller knows is: how to report bus reset
and how to receive or transmit the data...
Thanks,
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-12 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-12 18:56 [PATCH] usb/fsl_qe_udc: Report disconnect before unbinding Anton Vorontsov
2008-11-12 19:38 ` Alan Stern
2008-11-12 19:59 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2008-11-12 20:12 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-11-12 20:20 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-11-12 21:12 ` Alan Stern
2008-11-13 11:57 ` [PATCH v2] " Anton Vorontsov
2008-11-18 1:01 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081112195916.GA31938@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
--to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=leoli@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).