From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0981EDDDED for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:53:16 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 04:53:05 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: Large stack usage in fs code (especially for PPC64) Message-ID: <20081118095305.GA24119@infradead.org> References: <1226963005.7178.248.camel@pasglop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1226963005.7178.248.camel@pasglop> Cc: Thomas Gleixner , LKML , Steven Rostedt , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:03:25AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 15:34 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Note, I was using a default config that had CONFIG_IRQSTACKS off and > > CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES on. > > For one, we definitely need to turn IRQSTACKS on by default ... In fact, > I'm pondering just removing the option. It shouldn't be a user-visible option. It shouldn't on x86 either, but there it always gets into the ideological 4k stacks flameware so people usually gave up after a while instead of doing the sensibke 8k + irqstacks by default, 4k as an option..