From: Laurent Pinchart <laurentp@cse-semaphore.com>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, kumar.gala@freescale.com, vbordug@ru.mvista.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpm2: Round the baud-rate clock divider to the nearest integer.
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:04:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200811211704.56808.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081120195347.GA29459@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net>
Hi Scott,
On Thursday 20 November 2008, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 01:32:23PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Instead of rounding the divider down, improve the baud-rate generators
> > accuracy by rounding to the nearest integer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurentp@cse-semaphore.com>
>
> This makes things worse on mpc8272ads -- the result of the division is
> 13.56, but I only get error-free serial output when rounding down. I
> don't think the remote end has timing problems, as I don't see this with
> any other board.
I get exactly the opposite here with an mpc8248 base board. Rounding down
makes 115200bds completely unreliable :-/
Could you measure the serial baudrate with and without the patch using an
oscilloscope ?
> Possibly the crystal is a little off,
That's always possible.
> or maybe it's just better to be a little too fast than a little too slow for
> some reason?
>
> Maybe we should change CPM_CLK to be MAIN_CLK/4 rather than MAIN_CLK/16
> when the BRG clock is below a certain frequency.
Isn't that the job of the boot loader ? Accuracy would be improved, but power
consumption will raise as well :-/
Best regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-21 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-20 12:32 [PATCH] cpm2: Round the baud-rate clock divider to the nearest integer Laurent Pinchart
2008-11-20 15:32 ` Kumar Gala
2008-11-20 15:57 ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-11-20 16:00 ` Kumar Gala
2008-11-20 16:42 ` Laurent Pinchart
2009-01-15 13:18 ` Laurent Pinchart
2009-01-15 14:42 ` Kumar Gala
2009-01-15 14:58 ` Laurent Pinchart
2009-01-15 17:54 ` Scott Wood
2009-01-15 18:57 ` Kumar Gala
2009-01-16 9:50 ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-11-20 19:53 ` Scott Wood
2008-11-21 16:04 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2008-11-21 17:00 ` Scott Wood
2009-01-27 17:20 ` Kumar Gala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200811211704.56808.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com \
--to=laurentp@cse-semaphore.com \
--cc=kumar.gala@freescale.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=vbordug@ru.mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).