From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com [207.106.133.19]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 273EEDDDF0 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:56:49 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:49:56 -0600 From: Nathan Lynch To: Dave Hansen Subject: Re: Nodes with no memory Message-ID: <20081122004956.GT6830@localdomain> References: <1227311441.11607.57.camel@nimitz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1227311441.11607.57.camel@nimitz> Cc: linuxppc-dev , mjw , Paul Mackerras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Dave Hansen wrote: > I was handed off a bug report about a blade not booting with a, um > "newer" kernel. If you're unable to provide basic information such as the kernel version then perhaps this isn't the best forum for discussing this. :) > I'm thinking that we need to at least fix careful_allocation() to oops > and not return NULL, or check to make sure all it callers check its > return code. Well, careful_allocation() in current mainline tries pretty hard to panic if it can't satisfy the request. Why isn't that happening?