From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com (e5.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e5.ny.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB078DDDFB for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:04:40 +1100 (EST) Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e5.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mAP14QAl008610 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:04:26 -0500 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id mAP14aNr163470 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:04:36 -0500 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id mAP14EOx022518 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:04:15 -0500 Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:04:26 -0500 From: Josh Boyer To: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the 4xx tree Message-ID: <20081124200426.22cbe4c5@zod.rchland.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20081125115021.b4782240.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20081125115021.b4782240.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: ppc-dev , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:50:21 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Josh, > > Today's linux-next merge of the 4xx tree got a conflict in > arch/powerpc/configs/ppc44x_defconfig between commit > c8d698849e135780738c2cb08f07f06eda982a8c ("powerpc/virtex: Update > defconfigs") from the powerpc-merge tree and commit > 867b71f3da64eb917c23cfd8babcd1c4fc0ba7fd ("powerpc/44x: update > ppc44x_defconfig") from the 4xx tree. Sigh. > I fixed it up (by setting CONFIG_GPIO_XILINX to y as is done in the > former). I can carry this fix until either your tree is merged by Paul or > you do a merge against the powerpc-merge tree (or Linus' tree after he > takes Paul's tree). I tend to rebase my next branch off of Paul's next branch, so if he updates his tomorrow I can just do that and we will all be happy. If that isn't done by my afternoon time, I'll fix it up myself. There's no reason you should have to carry an extra patch. linux-next is hard enough :) josh