linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: __cpu_up vs. start_secondary race?
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 23:20:20 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081203052020.GG6829@localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1228279963.7356.238.camel@pasglop>

Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 20:16 -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> > Apart from barriers (or lack thereof), the fact that __cpu_up gives up
> > after a more-or-less arbitrary period seems... well, arbitrary.  If we
> > get to "Processor X is stuck" then something is seriously wrong:
> > there's either a kernel bug or a platform issue, and the CPU just
> > kicked is in an unknown state.  Polling indefinitely seems safer, no?
> > Especially since some hypervisors allow overcommitting processors and
> > memory, which can introduce latencies in unexpected places.
> 
> I'm pretty happy to keep the timeout :-) Proved useful in many cases
> where we actually fail to bring it up or crash it at bringup. From my
> experience, most of the time, the stuck CPU isn't getting in the way and
> it gets us a chance to move forward.

Fair enough -- thanks.

      reply	other threads:[~2008-12-03  5:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-01 21:30 __cpu_up vs. start_secondary race? Nathan Lynch
2008-12-01 22:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-12-03  2:16   ` Nathan Lynch
2008-12-03  4:14     ` Trent Piepho
2008-12-03  4:52     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-12-03  5:20       ` Nathan Lynch [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081203052020.GG6829@localdomain \
    --to=ntl@pobox.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).