From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com (e33.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.151]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e32.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC65ADDDE3 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:47:02 +1100 (EST) Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mB4CkKnG006532 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 05:46:20 -0700 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id mB4CkvZ4226166 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 05:46:57 -0700 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id mB4CkusP030608 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 05:46:56 -0700 Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:46:53 -0500 From: Josh Boyer To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] powerpc: Split mmu_context handling Message-ID: <20081204074653.0a8edf2d@zod.rchland.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20081204054228.E8FE6DDE0F@ozlabs.org> References: <20081204054228.E8FE6DDE0F@ozlabs.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Kumar Gala List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:41:48 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: Stephen had a bunch of comments as well, so I'll spare you those again... > Index: linux-work/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_nohash.c > =================================================================== > --- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000 > +++ linux-work/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_nohash.c 2008-12-03 13:50:18.000000000 +1100 > @@ -0,0 +1,168 @@ > +/* > + * This file contains the routines for handling the MMU on those > + * PowerPC implementations where the MMU substantially follows the > + * architecture specification. This includes the 6xx, 7xx, 7xxx, > + * 8260, and POWER3 implementations but excludes the 8xx and 4xx. > + * -- paulus ..but I couldn't let this one go. Totally incorrect comments here given that the file is _for_ 8xx and 4xx. I suspect an errant copy/paste :). josh