From: Yuri Tikhonov <yur@emcraft.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, wd@denx.de,
dzu@denx.de, yanok@emcraft.com
Subject: [PATCH 07/11] md: rewrite handle_stripe_dirtying6 in asynchronous way
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 00:57:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200812090057.33890.yur@emcraft.com> (raw)
Rewrite handle_stripe_dirtying6 function to work asynchronously.
Signed-off-by: Yuri Tikhonov <yur@emcraft.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok <yanok@emcraft.com>
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 113 ++++++++++++++--------------------------------------
1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index e08ed4f..f0b47bd 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -2485,99 +2485,46 @@ static void handle_stripe_dirtying6(raid5_conf_t *conf,
struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s,
struct r6_state *r6s, int disks)
{
- int rcw = 0, must_compute = 0, pd_idx = sh->pd_idx, i;
+ int rcw = 0, pd_idx = sh->pd_idx, i;
int qd_idx = r6s->qd_idx;
+
+ set_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state);
for (i = disks; i--; ) {
struct r5dev *dev = &sh->dev[i];
- /* Would I have to read this buffer for reconstruct_write */
- if (!test_bit(R5_OVERWRITE, &dev->flags)
- && i != pd_idx && i != qd_idx
- && (!test_bit(R5_LOCKED, &dev->flags)
- ) &&
- !test_bit(R5_UPTODATE, &dev->flags)) {
- if (test_bit(R5_Insync, &dev->flags)) rcw++;
- else {
- pr_debug("raid6: must_compute: "
- "disk %d flags=%#lx\n", i, dev->flags);
- must_compute++;
+ /* check if we haven't enough data */
+ if (!test_bit(R5_OVERWRITE, &dev->flags) &&
+ i != pd_idx && i != qd_idx &&
+ !test_bit(R5_LOCKED, &dev->flags) &&
+ !(test_bit(R5_UPTODATE, &dev->flags) ||
+ test_bit(R5_Wantcompute, &dev->flags))) {
+ rcw++;
+ if (!test_bit(R5_Insync, &dev->flags))
+ continue; /* it's a failed drive */
+
+ if (
+ test_bit(STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE, &sh->state)) {
+ pr_debug("Read_old stripe %llu "
+ "block %d for Reconstruct\n",
+ (unsigned long long)sh->sector, i);
+ set_bit(R5_LOCKED, &dev->flags);
+ set_bit(R5_Wantread, &dev->flags);
+ s->locked++;
+ } else {
+ pr_debug("Request delayed stripe %llu "
+ "block %d for Reconstruct\n",
+ (unsigned long long)sh->sector, i);
+ set_bit(STRIPE_DELAYED, &sh->state);
+ set_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state);
}
}
}
- pr_debug("for sector %llu, rcw=%d, must_compute=%d\n",
- (unsigned long long)sh->sector, rcw, must_compute);
- set_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state);
-
- if (rcw > 0)
- /* want reconstruct write, but need to get some data */
- for (i = disks; i--; ) {
- struct r5dev *dev = &sh->dev[i];
- if (!test_bit(R5_OVERWRITE, &dev->flags)
- && !(s->failed == 0 && (i == pd_idx || i == qd_idx))
- && !test_bit(R5_LOCKED, &dev->flags) &&
- !test_bit(R5_UPTODATE, &dev->flags) &&
- test_bit(R5_Insync, &dev->flags)) {
- if (
- test_bit(STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE, &sh->state)) {
- pr_debug("Read_old stripe %llu "
- "block %d for Reconstruct\n",
- (unsigned long long)sh->sector, i);
- set_bit(R5_LOCKED, &dev->flags);
- set_bit(R5_Wantread, &dev->flags);
- s->locked++;
- } else {
- pr_debug("Request delayed stripe %llu "
- "block %d for Reconstruct\n",
- (unsigned long long)sh->sector, i);
- set_bit(STRIPE_DELAYED, &sh->state);
- set_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state);
- }
- }
- }
/* now if nothing is locked, and if we have enough data, we can start a
* write request
*/
- if (s->locked == 0 && rcw == 0 &&
+ if ((s->req_compute || !test_bit(STRIPE_COMPUTE_RUN, &sh->state)) &&
+ s->locked == 0 && rcw == 0 &&
!test_bit(STRIPE_BIT_DELAY, &sh->state)) {
- if (must_compute > 0) {
- /* We have failed blocks and need to compute them */
- switch (s->failed) {
- case 0:
- BUG();
- case 1:
- compute_block_1(sh, r6s->failed_num[0], 0);
- break;
- case 2:
- compute_block_2(sh, r6s->failed_num[0],
- r6s->failed_num[1]);
- break;
- default: /* This request should have been failed? */
- BUG();
- }
- }
-
- pr_debug("Computing parity for stripe %llu\n",
- (unsigned long long)sh->sector);
- compute_parity6(sh, RECONSTRUCT_WRITE);
- /* now every locked buffer is ready to be written */
- for (i = disks; i--; )
- if (test_bit(R5_LOCKED, &sh->dev[i].flags)) {
- pr_debug("Writing stripe %llu block %d\n",
- (unsigned long long)sh->sector, i);
- s->locked++;
- set_bit(R5_Wantwrite, &sh->dev[i].flags);
- }
- if (s->locked == disks)
- if (!test_and_set_bit(STRIPE_FULL_WRITE, &sh->state))
- atomic_inc(&conf->pending_full_writes);
- /* after a RECONSTRUCT_WRITE, the stripe MUST be in-sync */
- set_bit(STRIPE_INSYNC, &sh->state);
-
- if (test_and_clear_bit(STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE, &sh->state)) {
- atomic_dec(&conf->preread_active_stripes);
- if (atomic_read(&conf->preread_active_stripes) <
- IO_THRESHOLD)
- md_wakeup_thread(conf->mddev->thread);
- }
+ schedule_reconstruction(sh, s, 1, 0);
}
}
--
1.5.6.1
next reply other threads:[~2008-12-08 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-08 21:57 Yuri Tikhonov [this message]
2009-01-15 21:51 ` [PATCH 07/11] md: rewrite handle_stripe_dirtying6 in asynchronous way Dan Williams
2009-01-15 22:21 ` Dan Williams
2009-01-16 1:07 ` Cheng Renquan
2009-01-16 14:46 ` Re[2]: " Yuri Tikhonov
2009-01-16 14:24 ` Yuri Tikhonov
2009-01-16 18:39 ` Dan Williams
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-11-13 15:15 [RFC PATCH 00/11] md: support for asynchronous execution of RAID6 operations Ilya Yanok
2008-11-13 15:16 ` [PATCH 07/11] md: rewrite handle_stripe_dirtying6 in asynchronous way Ilya Yanok
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200812090057.33890.yur@emcraft.com \
--to=yur@emcraft.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dzu@denx.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=wd@denx.de \
--cc=yanok@emcraft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).