[PATCH 3/8] cleanup careful_allocation(): bootmem already panics

[Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

If we fail a bootmem allocation, the bootmem code itself
panics.  No need to redo it here.

Also change the wording of the other panic.  We don't
strictly have to allocate memory on the specified node.
It is just a hint and that node may not even *have* any
memory on it.  In that case we can and do fall back to
other nodes.


Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

 linux-2.6.git-dave/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c |    6 +-----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff -puN arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c~cleanup-careful_allocation arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
--- linux-2.6.git/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c~cleanup-careful_allocation	2008-12-09 10:16:05.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.git-dave/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c	2008-12-09 10:16:05.000000000 -0800
@@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ static void __init *careful_allocation(i
 		ret = __lmb_alloc_base(size, align, lmb_end_of_DRAM());
 
 	if (!ret)
-		panic("numa.c: cannot allocate %lu bytes on node %d",
+		panic("numa.c: cannot allocate %lu bytes for node %d",
 		      size, nid);
 
 	/*
@@ -856,10 +856,6 @@ static void __init *careful_allocation(i
 		ret = (unsigned long)__alloc_bootmem_node(NODE_DATA(new_nid),
 				size, align, 0);
 
-		if (!ret)
-			panic("numa.c: cannot allocate %lu bytes on node %d",
-			      size, new_nid);
-
 		ret = __pa(ret);
 
 		dbg("alloc_bootmem %lx %lx\n", ret, size);
_