From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from buildserver.ru.mvista.com (unknown [85.21.88.6]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87FA6DDF29 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 05:44:53 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:44:51 +0300 From: Anton Vorontsov To: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/83xx: Fix few build errors with CONFIG_QUICC_ENGINE=n Message-ID: <20081216184451.GA6959@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> References: <20081205165504.GA30966@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <6C14C18C-D709-4E69-8B47-C8A13380D713@kernel.crashing.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 In-Reply-To: <6C14C18C-D709-4E69-8B47-C8A13380D713@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Timur Tabi Reply-To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:18:07PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: [..] >> This patch implements traditional way of !QE case handling. >> Alternative version is coming (w/o ifdefs in the board files). >> >> p.s. I don't know if it is 2.6.28 material... > > what's the state of this patch vs the alternate version? Pros of the alternative version: - No #ifdefs in .c files. Cons of the alternative version: - For this code (assuming QE=n): if ((np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "par_io")) != NULL) par_io_init(np); GCC can still issue the of_find_node_by_name() call. (I wonder if there is any way to tell gcc that particular function doesn't produce any side-effects so that gcc can optimize it away too). It's up to you to decide which version you want to merge. -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2