From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from kira.home.fluff.org (aeryn.fluff.org.uk [87.194.8.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7016DDED4 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:35:52 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:06:35 +0000 From: Ben Dooks To: Jochen Friedrich Subject: Re: Please pull bjdoo ks' i2c-fixes Message-ID: <20081218100635.GH8032@fluff.org.uk> References: <4948E89A.7080703@scram.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4948E89A.7080703@scram.de> Cc: Mike Ditto , linuxppc-dev list , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Ben Dooks , khali@linux-fr.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:55:06PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote: > Hi Ben, > > > Mike Ditto (1): > > i2c-cpm: Detect and report NAK right away instead of timing out > > Could you also have a look at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/7452/ ? > (Discussion at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/6666/ ) > > IIRC, Kumar prefers to push this via your tree. Ok, but this isn't really a fix, so I'll look at putting it into my i2c-next tree, not i2c-fixes. -- Ben (ben@fluff.org, http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'