From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <davem@davemloft.net>
Received: from sunset.davemloft.net (unknown [74.93.104.97])
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F6ADDECF
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 16:51:53 +1100 (EST)
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:51:56 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <20081230.215156.151347026.davem@davemloft.net>
To: sfr@canb.auug.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ehea: bitops work on unsigned longs
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <20081231141853.c6d123c4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
References: <20081231141853.c6d123c4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: tklein@de.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, raisch@de.ibm.com,
	themann@de.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/options/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:18:53 +1100

> These changes will avoid several warnings when we change u64 to unsigned
> long long.
> 
> Also, ehea_driver_flags is only used in ehca_main.c
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---

And also rejected, just like the previous two.

This is so much worse than the problems we had with
printing u64's and it's being done as a result to
the "fix" for that.

Please let's not do this...