From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cursor.subgra.de (cursor.subgra.de [78.46.252.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cursor.subgra.de", Issuer "cursor.subgra.de" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09B9DDE076 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2009 19:43:58 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 09:11:21 +0100 From: Benjamin Krill To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] serial: add support for the cell network processor NWP device Message-ID: <20090107081120.GB3306@codiert.org> References: <200811241453.32166.arnd@arndb.de> <1231297694.14860.55.camel@pasglop> <20090106202143.b31b908e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <20090106202143.b31b908e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , >My version is mucked up anyway - PORT_NWPSERIAL has the same value as >PORT_S3C6400. Should I send an updated version against a current tree? ben