From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: iws@ovro.caltech.edu
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, shemminger@vyatta.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v5] net: add PCINet driver
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:16:10 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090108.111610.132149837.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090107195052.GA24981@ovro.caltech.edu>
From: Ira Snyder <iws@ovro.caltech.edu>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 11:50:52 -0800
> This adds support to Linux for a virtual ethernet interface which uses the
> PCI bus as its transport mechanism. It creates a simple, familiar, and fast
> method of communication for two devices connected by a PCI interface.
Well, it looks like much more than that to me.
What is this UART thing in here for?
I can only assume it's meant to be used as a console port between the
x86 host and the powerpc nodes.
You haven't even mentioned this UART aspect even indirectly in the
commit message.
This just looks like yet another set of virtualization drivers
to me. You could have just have easily built this using your
own PCI backplane framework, and using the virtio stuff on top.
And the virtio stuff has all kinds of snazzy optimizations that
will likely improve your throughput, it has console drivers that
distributions already probe for and attach appropriately, etc.
In short I really don't like this conceptually, it can be done
so much better using facilities we already have that are
heavily optimized and userland understands already.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-08 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-07 19:50 [PATCH RFC v5] net: add PCINet driver Ira Snyder
2009-01-08 19:16 ` David Miller [this message]
2009-01-08 19:27 ` Ira Snyder
2009-01-08 21:51 ` Ira Snyder
2009-01-10 23:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-01-12 17:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-01-13 2:32 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-13 3:34 ` Ira Snyder
2009-01-13 16:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-01-13 16:40 ` Ira Snyder
2009-01-13 17:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-01-15 0:12 ` Ira Snyder
2009-01-15 12:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-01-15 16:54 ` Ira Snyder
2009-01-15 17:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-01-15 18:20 ` Ira Snyder
2009-01-15 20:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-01-15 23:27 ` Ira Snyder
2009-01-15 19:21 ` Ira Snyder
2009-01-15 21:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-01-15 21:40 ` Ira Snyder
2009-01-15 22:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-01-15 23:31 ` Ira Snyder
2009-01-16 9:15 ` Jan-Bernd Themann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090108.111610.132149837.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=iws@ovro.caltech.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).