From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-mm@kvack.org, mel@csn.ul.ie,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.28-git-4 - powerpc - kernel expection 'c01 at .kernel_thread'
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:07:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090112083734.GB8409@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200901120907.20418.rjw@sisk.pl>
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> [2009-01-12 09:07:19]:
> On Monday 12 January 2009, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> > * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> [2009-01-11 01:08:19]:
> >
> > > On Friday 02 January 2009, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > 2.6.28-git4 kernel drops to xmon with kernel expection. Similar kernel
> > > > expection was seen next-20081230 and next-20081231 and was reported
> > > > earlier at http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/31/157
> > >
> > > Is this a regression from 2.6.27?
> > >
> > > Rafael
> > >
> >
> > This is not a regression from 2.6.27, this expection was first seen
> > next-20081230 patches and then was introduced into 2.6.28-git4 and is
> > reproducible with 2.6.28-rc1 kernel.
>
> Presumably you meant 2.6.29-rc1 ? In which case it would be a regression from
> 2.6.28 . Please confirm.
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
sorry, I meant it was introduced in 2.6.28-git4 and is still reproducible
with 2.6.29-rc1.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Kamalesh Babulal,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM, ISTL.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-12 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-02 12:57 [BUG] 2.6.28-git-4 - powerpc - kernel expection 'c01 at .kernel_thread' Kamalesh Babulal
2009-01-11 0:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-12 7:21 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2009-01-12 8:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-12 8:37 ` Kamalesh Babulal [this message]
2009-01-12 8:42 ` 赵赵萍
2009-01-12 8:50 ` How to unsubscribe, Was: " Simon Kagstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090112083734.GB8409@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).