From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sunset.davemloft.net (unknown [74.93.104.97]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786A8DE10C for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:38:41 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:38:41 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20090114.143841.153393716.davem@davemloft.net> To: afleming@freescale.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] phylib: Fix Freescale TBI PHY detection From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <4DDB8462-ACB6-494A-A1CB-4F56668A4EE1@freescale.com> References: <20090113160513.GA22083@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20090114150332.GA839@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <4DDB8462-ACB6-494A-A1CB-4F56668A4EE1@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Andy Fleming Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:20:35 -0600 > On Jan 14, 2009, at 9:03 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > >> > >> There is one thing I don't actually understand though... > >> > >> Andy, were you testing the TBI support on a hardware where PHY ID > >> != 0x0 or maybe your TBI PHY support patch (commit b31a1d8b41513b, > >> dated Tue Dec 16 15:29:15 2008) was based on a bit outdated kernel > >> version? Because according to the git timestamps, the TBI support > >> was not working since the submission. > >> > >> Just in case, the hardware I'm seeing the PHY ID == 0x0 is > >> MPC8378E-MDS. > > > > I think I got it. Probably the TBI support patch was based on the > > powerpc.git next, and the commit that broke the TBI support > > was in the net-next-2.6 tree. > > > > That explains why nobody noticed the issue. > > > Yeah, I dropped the ball. I saw the patch go in, thought that might break something, but I didn't find time to look into it. Thanks for finding and reverting this bug. > > Acked-by: Andy Fleming Patch applied, thanks everyone. I was worried when I applied the patch causing this, that some device would in fact trigger that specific test. Turns out my worries were warranted :)