From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ovro.ovro.caltech.edu (ovro.ovro.caltech.edu [192.100.16.2]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 605C8DE273 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 06:21:32 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:21:29 -0800 From: Ira Snyder To: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v5] net: add PCINet driver Message-ID: <20090115192129.GB9091@ovro.caltech.edu> References: <20090107195052.GA24981@ovro.caltech.edu> <200901151358.34250.arnd@arndb.de> <20090115165359.GA2230@ovro.caltech.edu> <200901151853.52202.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200901151853.52202.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, shemminger@vyatta.com, David Miller List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 06:53:51PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 15 January 2009, Ira Snyder wrote: > > > > These are PCI boards, not PCIe. The host computers are all Pentium3-M > > systems. I tried enabling MSI on the Freescale boards in the driver, by > > calling pci_enable_msi() during probe(), and it failed. > > That doesn't really mean anything, just that the PCI endpoint doesn't > announce its capability to do MSI in the config space, or that it > does not have an interrupt line. Since you basically implement the > device on the FSL board, you should also be able to define the interrupt > capabilities by writing to the config space. > > Do you know what kind of chipset the host uses? It should be fairly > simple to find out whether or not it can do MSI. > I have another question for you Arnd. What did you use as the host and guest drivers when you ran virtio over PCI? Did you use two unmodified instances of virtio_net (one on host, one on guest) for networking, or did you write new virtio drivers for those? How about for virtio_console (if you ran it at all). Thanks again, Ira