From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@pikatech.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Defconfig support
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:29:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090120112930.GF3853@zod.rchland.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090119232136.717eddf3@lappy.seanm.ca>
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:21:36PM -0500, Sean MacLennan wrote:
>Since the list seems quiet right now, thought I would ask a question.
>Up till now I haven't really worried about the warp defconfig being up
>to date since, realistically, the stock kernel was not usable on the
>warp. Since it usually boots from NAND, the lack of an ndfc driver
>made it unbootable in a production system.
>
>However, the 2.6.29 kernel will boot, so the defconfig problem becomes
>more acute. The problem is keeping the changes that are required for
>the warp while also handling the normal changes that happen every
>release.
>
>For example, the current git diff shows CONFIG_SIMPLE_GPIO which is
>just a new feature and can be safely left unset. But the watchdog made
>it into the kernel, so CONFIG_PIKA_WDT should be set for a warp.
>
>Any ideas for a good way of handling this?
You can certainly send me patches for defconfig updates. I go through
and update them all (via make xxx_defconfig; make oldconfig) after -rc2
is available, but I might not set everything exactly as you would want
to see it.
If there's a chicken/egg problem in that there are drivers or changes
that went upstream but aren't in the powerpc branches yet for one reason
or another, you can poke me about getting things pulled in.
Since I'll be doing defconfig updates today, just tell me which options
you need set or disabled.
josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-20 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-20 4:21 Defconfig support Sean MacLennan
2009-01-20 11:29 ` Josh Boyer [this message]
2009-01-21 1:09 ` Sean MacLennan
2009-01-21 1:15 ` Josh Boyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090120112930.GF3853@zod.rchland.ibm.com \
--to=jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=smaclennan@pikatech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).