From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sunset.davemloft.net (unknown [74.93.104.97]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5DE4DDF51 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:12:10 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:12:10 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20090121.231210.261407216.davem@davemloft.net> To: paulus@samba.org Subject: Re: perf_counter vs. oprofile From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <18808.6885.373593.934704@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <20090121.212634.237965647.davem@davemloft.net> <18808.6885.373593.934704@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Paul Mackerras Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:06:13 +1100 > Out of curiosity, what ppc hardware are you using perf_counters on? > A G5? An UltraSPARC-IIIi :-) I just wanted to make sure you realized the conflict, and you obviously do.