From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from buildserver.ru.mvista.com (unknown [85.21.88.6]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A9EDDED9 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2009 05:05:22 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 21:05:20 +0300 From: Anton Vorontsov To: Pierre Ossman Subject: [PATCH RFC 0/11] FSL eSDHC support: second call for comments Message-ID: <20090206180520.GA16123@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Cc: Ben Dooks , Arnd Bergmann , Liu Dave , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, sdhci-devel@list.drzeus.cx Reply-To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi all, There were only a few comments on the previous version. So, here is the second call for comments. Changes since the first RFC: - Use of_iomap() in sdhci-of.c (suggested by Arnd Bergmann). Also added Arnd's Acked-by: line for the sdhci-of patch. - Kconfig help text improved (thanks to Matt Sealey and M. Warner Losh). - In "sdhci: Add quirk to suppress PIO interrupts during DMA transfers" patch: sdhci_init() now clears SDHCI_PIO_DISABLED flag, otherwise we won't disable PIO interrupts after suspend. - New patch: "sdhci: Add type checking for IO memory accessors" That's all, for now. Pierre, what do you think about memory accessors, what is your preference regarding mem ops? Some options were discussed here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/22/261 Thanks! -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2