Re: [PATCH 08/11] sdhci: Add support for hosts that don't specify clocks in the cap. register

[Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1033 bytes --]

On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 21:06:57 +0300
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com> wrote:

> FSL eSDHC hosts don't provide clocks bits in the capabilities register,
> instead we're getting clocks values from the device tree.
> 
> There is somewhat similar change[1] from Ben Dooks, the change adds
> callbacks for getting the clocks. But for eSDHC the callbacks are
> superfluous, since the clocks are static.
> 
> [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/2/157
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
> ---

As I told Ben, I prefer if we stick to the standard as much as
possible. So no external info unless the register is set to zero.

And since we know the Samsung chip needs callbacks, we might as well
add them here. It's not like this is a performance critical path.

Rgds
-- 
     -- Pierre Ossman

  WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
  Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
  for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
  encryption.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]