From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sunset.davemloft.net (unknown [74.93.104.97]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A73F6DDDCA for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:47:40 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:47:33 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20090211.174733.163367216.davem@davemloft.net> To: npiggin@suse.de Subject: Re: next Feb 10: mm/slqb build break From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20090212014503.GD30043@wotan.suse.de> References: <49914EE7.7030205@in.ibm.com> <84144f020902100353x4074f342ne4d61483074a06b7@mail.gmail.com> <20090212014503.GD30043@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Nick Piggin Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:45:03 +0100 > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 01:53:51PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > Actually, that's not the root cause here. You seem to have CONFIG_SMP > > disabled but CONFIG_NUMA enabled. That's not possible on x86 which > > makes me think it's a ppc kconfig bug. Hmm? > > If it is really a valid config, then we should be able to make > slqb build with it... FWIW I only allow NUMA with SMP on sparc64, just like x86. Although it seems IA64, like powerpc, does not have this restriction. Hmmm...