From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from kira.home.fluff.org (aeryn.fluff.org.uk [87.194.8.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F719DDDA4 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:16:54 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:16:36 +0000 From: Ben Dooks To: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-mpc: do not allow interruptions when waiting for I2C to complete Message-ID: <20090211001636.GA19758@fluff.org.uk> References: <1233928837-3401-1-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> <20090210165554.0da8bf7c@hyperion.delvare> <4991A4F2.8030506@freescale.com> <20090210171000.1f45cc2d@hyperion.delvare> <4991A970.70508@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4991A970.70508@freescale.com> Cc: Jean Delvare , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Kumar Gala , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Ben Dooks List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:21:04AM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote: > Jean Delvare wrote: > > > To the best of my knowledge i2c-mpc falls into the "embedded platforms" > > category and is thus under Ben's responsibility. > > I don't see his Signed-off-by on any patch to i2c-mpc.c for the past > three years (at least). I do see yours, however. You have directly > applied similar patches in the recent past, so of course I will assume > that you would apply this one. My appointment as an embedded maintainer is relatively recent. I do try and review patches, and sometimes these patches get sent to another maintainer. -- Ben (ben@fluff.org, http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'