From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp [192.51.44.36]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA8CDDDAE for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:53:35 +1100 (EST) Received: from m1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.71]) by fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id n1BNrXJb020981 for (envelope-from kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com); Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:53:34 +0900 Received: from smail (m1 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80B445DD74 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:53:33 +0900 (JST) Received: from s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.91]) by m1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B1D545DD72 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:53:33 +0900 (JST) Received: from s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8453D1DB803A for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:53:33 +0900 (JST) Received: from ml14.s.css.fujitsu.com (ml14.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.104]) by s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 466BF1DB803C for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:53:33 +0900 (JST) From: KOSAKI Motohiro To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmalloc: Add __get_vm_area_caller() In-Reply-To: <20090211144509.d22feeb8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20090211171804.7021.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090211144509.d22feeb8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Message-Id: <20090212085156.C8DB.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:53:32 +0900 (JST) Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:22:47 +0900 (JST) > KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > > > I want to put into powerpc-next patches relying into that, so if the > > > patch is ok with you guys, can I stick it in powerpc.git ? > > > > hm. > > Generally, all MM patch should merge into -mm tree at first. > > but I don't think this patch have conflict risk. > > > > Andrew, What do you think? > > We can sneak it into mainline later in the week? I think this patch obiously doesn't have any regression risk. I obey your judgement.