linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Makefile: Include arch Makefiles as late as possible
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:20:01 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090216142001.GA27869@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090214195702.GB1241@uranus.ravnborg.org>

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 08:57:02PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
[...]
> > > --- a/Makefile
> > > +++ b/Makefile
> > > @@ -525,8 +525,6 @@ else
> > >  KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -O2
> > >  endif
> > >  
> > > -include $(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile
> > > -
> > >  ifneq (CONFIG_FRAME_WARN,0)
> > >  KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-Wframe-larger-than=${CONFIG_FRAME_WARN})
> > >  endif
> > > @@ -555,6 +553,8 @@ ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH
> > >  KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fno-inline-functions-called-once)
> > >  endif
> > >  
> > > +include $(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile
> > > +
> > >  # arch Makefile may override CC so keep this after arch Makefile is included
> > >  NOSTDINC_FLAGS += -nostdinc -isystem $(shell $(CC) -print-file-name=include)
> > >  CHECKFLAGS     += $(NOSTDINC_FLAGS)
> > > -- 
> > 
> > this patch is really for Sam to judge - Cc:-ed him.
> 
> If we move the include further down then the following:
> 
>     # Force gcc to behave correct even for buggy distributions
>     # Arch Makefiles may override this setting
>     KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
> 
> will most likely fail.

Hm... I don't get it, the comment says that the arch "may override
this setting", but currently it may not, since arch makefile is
included before this line. So my patch also fixes this "bug", no?

Or arches supposed to overwrite "cc-option" behaviour? Hm..

There is an interesting commit:

commit e06b8b98da071f7dd78fb7822991694288047df0
Author: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Date:   Wed Feb 13 22:43:28 2008 +0100

    kbuild: allow -fstack-protector to take effect
[...]
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -507,6 +507,10 @@ else
 KBUILD_CFLAGS  += -O2
 endif

+# Force gcc to behave correct even for buggy distributions
+# Arch Makefiles may override this setting
+KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
+
 include $(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile
 
 ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
@@ -525,9 +529,6 @@ ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH
 KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fno-inline-functions-called-once)
 endif
 
-# Force gcc to behave correct even for buggy distributions
-KBUILD_CFLAGS         += $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
-
 # arch Makefile may override CC so keep this after arch Makefile is included
 NOSTDINC_FLAGS += -nostdinc -isystem $(shell $(CC) -print-file-name=include)
 CHECKFLAGS     += $(NOSTDINC_FLAGS)


^^ Which does the same (wrt fno-stack-protector) as the patch I
sent, i.e. includes arch Makefile later.

But then, this commit reverted things back (w/o your Ack):

commit bef5b54bd7bf8117c75cb943d64549134c6d9a1f
Author: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date:   Wed Jul 16 13:02:24 2008 +0100

    Fix MIPS cross-compile problem
    [...]
    Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
    Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

[...]
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -508,6 +508,8 @@ else
 KBUILD_CFLAGS  += -O2
 endif
 
+include $(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile
+
 ifneq (CONFIG_FRAME_WARN,0)
 KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-Wframe-larger-than=${CONFIG_FRAME_WARN})
 endif
@@ -516,8 +518,6 @@ endif
 # Arch Makefiles may override this setting
 KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
 
-include $(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile
-
 ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
 KBUILD_CFLAGS  += -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls
 else


:-?

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-02-16 14:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-31 19:06 [PATCH] ftrace: On PowerPC we don't need frame pointers for CALLER_ADDRs Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-02  0:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-02 14:04   ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-03 14:56     ` [PATCH v2] " Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-03 16:06       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-03 16:19         ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-03 16:32           ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-03 18:59             ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-04  0:34               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04 15:07           ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-04 15:08             ` [PATCH 1/3] Makefile: Include arch Makefiles as late as possible Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-04 21:26               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-11  3:51                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-11 13:23                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-11 14:11                     ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-14 19:58                   ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-14 19:57                 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-14 22:03                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-15  0:19                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-15  8:09                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-16 14:20                   ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2009-02-16 14:53                     ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-16 20:04                       ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-16 16:08                     ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-16 17:22                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-04 15:08             ` [PATCH 2/3] powerpc: Make it possible to safely select CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-05  0:31               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-05  0:35                 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-05  1:12                   ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-05  1:15                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-05  1:30                     ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-05 15:45                       ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-04 15:08             ` [PATCH 3/3] tracing: Tracers that use CALLER_ADDR macros should select FRAME_POINTER Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-04 15:26               ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2009-02-04 15:31                 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-04 15:36                 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-04 16:50                   ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2009-02-04  8:17       ` [PATCH v2] ftrace: On PowerPC we don't need frame pointers forCALLER_ADDRs Usha Rani Konudula
2009-02-04  8:37         ` Usha Rani Konudula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090216142001.GA27869@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
    --to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).