From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Makefile: Include arch Makefiles as late as possible
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:53:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090216145317.GA3616@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090216142001.GA27869@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 05:20:01PM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 08:57:02PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> [...]
> > > > --- a/Makefile
> > > > +++ b/Makefile
> > > > @@ -525,8 +525,6 @@ else
> > > > KBUILD_CFLAGS += -O2
> > > > endif
> > > >
> > > > -include $(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile
> > > > -
> > > > ifneq (CONFIG_FRAME_WARN,0)
> > > > KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-Wframe-larger-than=${CONFIG_FRAME_WARN})
> > > > endif
> > > > @@ -555,6 +553,8 @@ ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH
> > > > KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fno-inline-functions-called-once)
> > > > endif
> > > >
> > > > +include $(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile
> > > > +
> > > > # arch Makefile may override CC so keep this after arch Makefile is included
> > > > NOSTDINC_FLAGS += -nostdinc -isystem $(shell $(CC) -print-file-name=include)
> > > > CHECKFLAGS += $(NOSTDINC_FLAGS)
> > > > --
> > >
> > > this patch is really for Sam to judge - Cc:-ed him.
> >
> > If we move the include further down then the following:
> >
> > # Force gcc to behave correct even for buggy distributions
> > # Arch Makefiles may override this setting
> > KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
> >
> > will most likely fail.
>
> Hm... I don't get it, the comment says that the arch "may override
> this setting", but currently it may not, since arch makefile is
> included before this line. So my patch also fixes this "bug", no?
>
> Or arches supposed to overwrite "cc-option" behaviour? Hm..
>
> There is an interesting commit:
>
> commit e06b8b98da071f7dd78fb7822991694288047df0
> Author: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
> Date: Wed Feb 13 22:43:28 2008 +0100
>
> kbuild: allow -fstack-protector to take effect
> [...]
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -507,6 +507,10 @@ else
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += -O2
> endif
>
> +# Force gcc to behave correct even for buggy distributions
> +# Arch Makefiles may override this setting
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
> +
> include $(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile
>
> ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
> @@ -525,9 +529,6 @@ ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fno-inline-functions-called-once)
> endif
>
> -# Force gcc to behave correct even for buggy distributions
> -KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
> -
> # arch Makefile may override CC so keep this after arch Makefile is included
> NOSTDINC_FLAGS += -nostdinc -isystem $(shell $(CC) -print-file-name=include)
> CHECKFLAGS += $(NOSTDINC_FLAGS)
>
>
> ^^ Which does the same (wrt fno-stack-protector) as the patch I
> sent, i.e. includes arch Makefile later.
>
> But then, this commit reverted things back (w/o your Ack):
>
> commit bef5b54bd7bf8117c75cb943d64549134c6d9a1f
> Author: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
> Date: Wed Jul 16 13:02:24 2008 +0100
>
> Fix MIPS cross-compile problem
> [...]
> Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Ok, I think I got it. It seems that Ralf was using this feature
of arch/mips/Makefile:
ifneq ($(SUBARCH),$(ARCH))
ifeq ($(CROSS_COMPILE),)
CROSS_COMPILE := $(call cc-cross-prefix, $(tool-archpref)-linux- $(tool-archpref)-linux-gnu- $(tool-archpref)-unknown-linux-gnu-)
endif
endif
There are few arches that have "auto detection" of CROSS_COMPILE
variable: mips, m68k, parisc, xtensa, h8300 and blackfin.
So `normal' arches don't have any chance to overwrite the flags
because of the few offenders above. ;-)
> [...]
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -508,6 +508,8 @@ else
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += -O2
> endif
>
> +include $(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile
> +
> ifneq (CONFIG_FRAME_WARN,0)
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-Wframe-larger-than=${CONFIG_FRAME_WARN})
> endif
> @@ -516,8 +518,6 @@ endif
> # Arch Makefiles may override this setting
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
>
> -include $(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile
> -
> ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls
> else
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-16 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-31 19:06 [PATCH] ftrace: On PowerPC we don't need frame pointers for CALLER_ADDRs Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-02 0:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-02 14:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-03 14:56 ` [PATCH v2] " Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-03 16:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-03 16:19 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-03 16:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-03 18:59 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-04 0:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04 15:07 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-04 15:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] Makefile: Include arch Makefiles as late as possible Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-04 21:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-11 3:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-11 13:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-11 14:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-14 19:58 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-14 19:57 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-14 22:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-15 0:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-15 8:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-16 14:20 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-16 14:53 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2009-02-16 20:04 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-16 16:08 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-16 17:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-04 15:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] powerpc: Make it possible to safely select CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-05 0:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-05 0:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-05 1:12 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-05 1:15 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-05 1:30 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-05 15:45 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-04 15:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] tracing: Tracers that use CALLER_ADDR macros should select FRAME_POINTER Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-04 15:26 ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2009-02-04 15:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-04 15:36 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-04 16:50 ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2009-02-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v2] ftrace: On PowerPC we don't need frame pointers forCALLER_ADDRs Usha Rani Konudula
2009-02-04 8:37 ` Usha Rani Konudula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090216145317.GA3616@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
--to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).