From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cursor.subgra.de (cursor.subgra.de [78.46.252.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cursor.subgra.de", Issuer "cursor.subgra.de" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E06BDDF71 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:46:08 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:47:39 +0100 From: Benjamin Krill To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Check name property to determine partition nodes. Message-ID: <20090218074738.GC12204@codiert.org> References: <20090123161805.GA2598@codiert.org> <1233720542.16867.187.camel@pasglop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <1233720542.16867.187.camel@pasglop> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, vwool@ru.mvista.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, David Woodhouse , dwg@au1.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , * Benjamin Herrenschmidt | 2009-02-04 15:09:02 [+1100]: >On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 17:18 +0100, Benjamin Krill wrote: >> SLOF has a further node which could not be evaluate >> by the current routine. The current routine returns >> because the node hasn't the required reg property. As >> fix this patch adds a check to determine the partition >> child nodes. If the node is not an partition the number >> of total partitions will be decreased and loop continue >> with the next nodes. > >Somebody on the MTD list is taking that ? David ? Or should I merge it >via powerpc ? Could somebody merge it for the next release? Ben