From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Ira Snyder <iws@ovro.caltech.edu>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Jan-Bernd Themann <THEMANN@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1] virtio: add virtio-over-PCI driver
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:13:03 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200902181713.03820.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090217222425.GA18801@ovro.caltech.edu>
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 08:54:25 Ira Snyder wrote:
> This adds support to Linux for using virtio between two computers linked by
> a PCI interface. This allows the use of virtio_net to create a familiar,
> fast interface for communication. It should be possible to use other virtio
> devices in the future, but this has not been tested.
Hi Ira,
It's only first glance, but this looks sane. Two things on first note:
don't restrict yourself to 32 feature bits (only PCI does this, and they're
going to have to hack when we reach feature 32).
Secondly:
> +You will notice that the algorithm has no way of handling chains that are
> +not exactly the same on the host and guest system. Without setting any of
> +the fancier virtio_net features, this is the case.
Hmm, I think we can do slightly better than this.
How about prepending a 4 byte length on the host buffers? Allows host to
specify length (for host->guest), and guest writes it to allow truncated
buffers on guest->host.
That won't allow you to transfer *more* than one buffersize to the host, but
you could use a different method (perhaps the 4 bytes indicates the *total*
length?).
Do 4-byte DMA's suck for some reason?
Cheers,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-18 6:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-17 22:24 [RFC v1] virtio: add virtio-over-PCI driver Ira Snyder
2009-02-18 6:43 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2009-02-18 16:38 ` Ira Snyder
2009-02-19 11:18 ` Rusty Russell
2009-02-19 16:49 ` Ira Snyder
2009-02-18 16:47 ` Kumar Gala
2009-02-19 6:13 ` Zang Roy-R61911
2009-02-19 16:51 ` Kumar Gala
2009-02-19 17:03 ` Ira Snyder
2009-02-20 3:44 ` Zang Roy-R61911
2009-02-19 6:10 ` Zang Roy-R61911
2009-02-19 16:14 ` Ira Snyder
2009-02-20 3:37 ` Zang Roy-R61911
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200902181713.03820.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=THEMANN@de.ibm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=iws@ovro.caltech.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).