From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sunset.davemloft.net (unknown [74.93.104.97]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F5BDDD0B for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:43:44 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:43:26 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20090220.004326.246398596.davem@davemloft.net> To: tklein@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] ehea: Fix memory hotplug handling From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <200902191232.12152.tklein@de.ibm.com> References: <200902191232.12152.tklein@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: jeff@garzik.org, themann@de.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, hering2@de.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, raisch@de.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Klein Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:32:11 +0100 > Added missing set_bit() to disable data transfer when a memchange > notification is handled > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Klein Applied to net-next-2.6 But this was a real pain because you never tell me what tree your changes are destined for. I assumed since you said "bug fix" you want this in net-2.6, but of course this patch doesn't apply there since the driver version is different in that tree. You can save me all of that trial-and-error wasted time if you simply say "net-next-2.6" or "net-2.6" either in the "[PATCH ...]" part of your subject or in the message body itself. Thanks.