From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from trinity.fluff.org (trinity.dh.bytemark.co.uk [89.16.178.74]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE072474C1 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:43:05 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 01:56:00 +0000 From: Ben Dooks To: Pierre Ossman Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] sdhci: Add quirk for controllers with no end-of-busy IRQ Message-ID: <20090223015559.GB30710@trinity.fluff.org> References: <20090220173228.GA5091@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20090220173308.GA7583@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20090221170504.657ff791@mjolnir.ossman.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20090221170504.657ff791@mjolnir.ossman.eu> Cc: Ben Dooks , Arnd Bergmann , Liu Dave , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, sdhci-devel@list.drzeus.cx List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 05:05:04PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:33:08 +0300 > Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > > From: Ben Dooks > > > > The Samsung SDHCI (and FSL eSDHC) controller block seems to fail > > to generate an INT_DATA_END after the transfer has completed and > > the bus busy state finished. > > > > Changes in e809517f6fa5803a5a1cd56026f0e2190fc13d5c to use the > > new busy method are the cause of the behaviour change. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks > > Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov > > --- > > Any objections to me merging this right away? It is needed for another > controller. none from me. sorry about the delay, moving servers. -- Ben Q: What's a light-year? A: One-third less calories than a regular year.