From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [85.118.1.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8EE1DDE22 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 04:54:36 +1100 (EST) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:54:33 -0800 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Greg KH Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH 2/2] x86-64: seccomp: fix 32/64 syscall hole Message-ID: <20090228095433.6af07a89@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20090228174601.GB27607@kroah.com> References: <20090228030226.C0D34FC3DA@magilla.sf.frob.com> <20090228030413.5B915FC3DA@magilla.sf.frob.com> <20090228072554.CFEA6FC3DA@magilla.sf.frob.com> <20090228174601.GB27607@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , stable@kernel.org, Roland McGrath List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:46:01 -0800 Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 09:23:36AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > But here is the patch you asked for. > > > > Yes, this looks much more straightforward. > > > > And I guess the seccomp interaction means that this is potentially > > a 2.6.29 thing. Not that I know whether anybody actually _uses_ > > seccomp. It does seem to be enabled in at least Fedora kernels, but > > it might not be used anywhere. > > It's enabled in SuSE kernels. > but are there users of it? I thought Andrea stopped the cpushare thing that was the only user of this.... -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org