linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
To: cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] powerpc/spufs: Fix incorrect buffer offset in regs write
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 10:32:35 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200903051032.36358.jk@ozlabs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.00.0903040935560.2416@vixen.sonytel.be>

Hi Geert,

> Could this be abused by an attacker to write registers or local store
> he's not allowed to do?

It looks like the user can only overwrite fields that it already has 
access to. There's struct spu_lscsa:

struct spu_lscsa {
	struct spu_reg128 gprs[128];
	struct spu_reg128 fpcr;
	struct spu_reg128 decr;
	struct spu_reg128 decr_status;
	struct spu_reg128 ppu_mb;
	struct spu_reg128 ppuint_mb;
	struct spu_reg128 tag_mask;
	struct spu_reg128 event_mask;
	struct spu_reg128 srr0;
	struct spu_reg128 stopped_status;
	unsigned char ls[LS_SIZE] __attribute__((aligned(65536)));
};

where spu_reg128 is a u32[4].

The maximum 'allowed' write offset to the regs file is 2047. The 
(incorrect) maximum offset calculated by the old code would be 8188 
(2047 * 4) bytes into struct spu_lscsa.

So, 8188 bytes covers all of the registers, but ends somewhere before 
the start of the ls area (within the ls alignment padding). Let's look 
at the registers:

gprs:			user-writable
fpcr:			user-writable
decr:			user-writable
decr_status:	only affects user-settable SPE state
ppu_mb:		only affects user-settable SPE state
ppuint_mb:		only affects user-settable SPE state
tag_mask:		only affects user-settable SPE state
event_mask:	only affects user-settable SPE state
srr0:			only affects user-settable SPE state
stopped_status: only affects user-settable SPE state

So, I think we're fine. All a user can do with this bug is mess up their 
own SPE state.

> Should it be backported to stable?

Yes, I'll submit to the stable tree too.

Cheers,


Jeremy

      reply	other threads:[~2009-03-04 23:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-04  5:39 [PATCH] powerpc/spufs: Fix incorrect buffer offset in regs write Jeremy Kerr
2009-03-04  8:36 ` [Cbe-oss-dev] " Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-03-04 23:32   ` Jeremy Kerr [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200903051032.36358.jk@ozlabs.org \
    --to=jk@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com \
    --cc=cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).