From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e37.co.us.ibm.com (e37.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e37.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5644DDF7F for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 04:13:19 +1100 (EST) Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e37.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n29HCnTD009864 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:12:49 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n29HDB7j223052 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:13:12 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n29HDACp007257 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:13:11 -0600 Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 13:12:43 -0400 From: Josh Boyer To: Mikhail Zolotaryov Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc 4xx: DDR0_14[REDUC] decoded incorrectly Message-ID: <20090309171243.GA26415@zod.rchland.ibm.com> References: <49B54210.5040709@lebon.org.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <49B54210.5040709@lebon.org.ua> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 06:21:36PM +0200, Mikhail Zolotaryov wrote: > Hi, > > according to the PPC440EPx Embedded Processor User Manual (rev 1.14) > DDR0_14[REDUC] bit has the following meaning: > > REDUC - Enable the half data path feature of the controller > 0 = Standard operation using full 64/72-bit memory bus > 1 = Memory data path width is 32/40 bits > > However, "1" is decoded as 64 bit (8 byte), "0" - as 32 bit (4 byte) bus > by the kernel code. My understanding is this is not correct - patch > attached. You are missing the Signed-off-by tag that is needed. Aside from that, I'm curious if you found this just through inspection, or if you actually had a problem because of it. Your fix seems correct, yet I've had no problems with my boards at all. josh