From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DBF95DE0AE for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:30:37 +1100 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:30:34 +0100 From: "Gerhard Pircher" Message-ID: <20090309213034.192330@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Does DRI/DRM still work on non-coherent DMA platforms? To: linuxppc-dev list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, I heard rumors that DRI doesn't work on SAM440EP (onboard Radeon GPU) boards. I had DRI halfway working on my AmigaOne (Radeon 9250) with an early release candidate of the 2.6.25 kernel and IIRC this patch here (manually applied): http://kerneltrap.org/index.php?q=mailarchive/git-commits-head/2008/3/30/1301044 I just tested DRI again on my A1 (I don't have a SAM board) with v2.6.29-rc6 and the machine looks up while starting the X server. Curiously DRI seems to work, if I specify "udbg-immortal" on the kernel command line and enable DRM debugging. Did anyone try out DRI on a non-coherent DMA PPC platform and can confirm that it still works? best regards, Gerhard -- Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger01