Re: [PATCH] PowerPC 440EPx/GRx fix memory size calculation

[Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>]

On Wednesday 11 March 2009, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> I've been looking at the docs once again and actually I couldn't find an
>    explanation there. And I don't have that e-mail from AMCC support
> that I got a while back regarding the issue anymore.
> There might have been some misunderstanding.
> The docs (PPC440EPX UM 19.2 Device Address Mapping) say that the chip
> select field width is always fixed at one bit, but this doesn't actually
>   mean that there's always one chip select used.
> The patch works fine on Sequoia and another Sequoia-like board with 1GB
> RAM installed, but it might not work with 2GB RAM. I've tried to play
> with DDR0_10 settings and Sequoia works fine regardless of what's
> actually written to DDR0_10.
> So, probably the best way would be to fix that in u-boot
> amcc/sequoia/sdram.c by doing mtsdram(DDR0_10, 0x00000100); instead of
> mtsdram(DDR0_10, 0x00000300);
> Sorry, for confusion, but after reviewing the docs, I think that
> only REDUC interpretation has to be fixed. The chips select part should
> be fixed in u-boot sdram code for Sequoia as was originally proposed by
> Mikhail.
>
> Stefan, could you please take a look?

I'll apply the U-Boot patch today. But as Josh pointed out, we should try to 
find a way for the bootwrapper to work in all cases.

Best regards,
Stefan