From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.180]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF5CDDE136 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:02:49 +1100 (EST) From: Stefan Roese To: Josh Boyer Subject: Re: [PATCH] PowerPC 440EPx/GRx fix memory size calculation Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:02:44 +0100 References: <49B58779.9040905@lebon.org.ua> <200903120924.13378.sr@denx.de> <20090312104543.GB3788@zod.rchland.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20090312104543.GB3788@zod.rchland.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200903121202.44406.sr@denx.de> Cc: lebon@lebon.org.ua, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thursday 12 March 2009, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> Yes, that's also how I use it on canyonlands... now, the wrapper could > >> probably be used to look at the bd_t anyways, no ? > > > >Sure. > > Do newer U-Boot versions pass both the dtb and the bd_t? Both is possible. The user can choose by using different boot commands (with or without device tree blob). When using the wrapper, the boot command has to be without the device tree and therefor the bd_t is passed to the kernel. Best regards, Stefan