From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <smaclennan@pikatech.com>
Received: from yow.seanm.ca (toronto-hs-216-138-233-67.s-ip.magma.ca
	[216.138.233.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0E74DE115
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 03:33:43 +1100 (EST)
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:33:38 -0400
From: Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@pikatech.com>
To: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: SLAB vs SLUB vs SLOB
Message-ID: <20090312123338.2ee7378b@lappy.seanm.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/options/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

Any advantages on the PPC of using SLUB or SLOB over SLAB? I am
especially interested in memory savings.

Cheers,
   Sean