From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Wolfgang Grandegegr <wg@grandegger.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] NAND: FSL-UPM: add multi chip support
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:27:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090317192735.GC4287@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1237281143-8768-2-git-send-email-wg@grandegger.com>
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:12:19AM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegegr wrote:
> From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
>
> This patch adds support for multi-chip NAND devices to the FSL-UPM
> driver. This requires support for multiple GPIOs for the RNB pins.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c
> index 7815a40..ca7e85a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <asm/fsl_lbc.h>
>
> +#define FSL_UPM_NAND_MAX_CHIPS 4
Is there any reason to hardcode max chips? Some obscure limit in the
UPMs maybe?
Otherwise we'd better allocate the rnb_gpios dynamically, depending
on the num-chips property.
Thanks,
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-17 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-17 9:12 [PATCH 0/4] NAND: Multi-chip support for FSL-UPM for TQM8548 modules Wolfgang Grandegegr
2009-03-17 9:12 ` [PATCH 1/4] NAND: FSL-UPM: add multi chip support Wolfgang Grandegegr
2009-03-17 9:12 ` [PATCH 2/4] NAND: FSL-UPM: add support for selecting chips via MAR Wolfgang Grandegegr
2009-03-17 9:12 ` [PATCH 3/4] NAND: FSL-UPM: Add wait flags to support board/chip specific delays Wolfgang Grandegegr
2009-03-17 9:12 ` [PATCH 4/4] powerpc/85xx: TQM8548: Update DTS file for multi-chip support Wolfgang Grandegegr
2009-03-17 9:12 ` Wolfgang Grandegegr
2009-03-17 19:23 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-18 7:34 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-03-18 18:51 ` Scott Wood
2009-03-17 19:01 ` [PATCH 3/4] NAND: FSL-UPM: Add wait flags to support board/chip specific delays Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-17 19:27 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2009-03-18 7:41 ` [PATCH 1/4] NAND: FSL-UPM: add multi chip support Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-03-18 13:02 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-17 13:56 ` [PATCH 0/4] NAND: Multi-chip support for FSL-UPM for TQM8548 modules Kumar Gala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090317192735.GC4287@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
--to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).