From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
Received: from buildserver.ru.mvista.com (unknown [213.79.90.228])
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87E6DDD04
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:28:01 +1100 (EST)
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:28:00 +0300
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc/83xx: Move gianfar mdio nodes under the
	ethernet nodes
Message-ID: <20090318152800.GA29557@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
References: <20090317185902.GB4055@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
	<D688018D-6CE0-4627-B813-FC552B1A6E83@kernel.crashing.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8
In-Reply-To: <D688018D-6CE0-4627-B813-FC552B1A6E83@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com>, David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reply-To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/options/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 08:21:18AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
[...]
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc834x_mds.c |    1 +
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc837x_mds.c |    1 +
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc837x_rdb.c |    1 +
>> 14 files changed, 398 insertions(+), 319 deletions(-)
>
> If we do this we should also fixup all the 85xx & 86xx .dts

OK.

It would be great to have #include <gianfar_enet.dts> facility in .dts
files. ;-) I heard some rumors about this, what was the consequence?..

[...]
>> +			ranges;
>
> Can this be proper?
> 			ranges = <0x0 0x24520 0x20>;

Yes, will change.

I was actually asking that q in RFC, i.e. whether we want
proper ranges or these stubs (I took stubs approach since
it's already in mpc8313_rdb device tree).

Thanks,

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2