From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
leoli@freescale.com,
'linuxppc-dev Development' <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ucc_geth: Move freeing of TX packets to NAPI context.
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:25:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090325142540.GA20944@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1237987849.2194.9.camel@gentoo-jocke.transmode.se>
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 02:30:49PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> >>From 1c2f23b1f37f4818c0fd0217b93eb38ab6564840 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:19:27 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] ucc_geth: Move freeing of TX packets to NAPI context.
> Also increase NAPI weight somewhat.
> This will make the system alot more responsive while
> ping flooding the ucc_geth ethernet interaface.
Some time ago I've tried a similar thing for this driver, but during
tcp (or udp I don't quite remember) netperf tests I was getting tx
watchdog timeouts after ~2-5 minutes of work. I was testing with a
gigabit and 100 Mbit link, with 100 Mbit link the issue was not
reproducible.
Though, I recalling I was doing a bit more than your patch: I was
also clearing the TX events in the ucce register before calling
ucc_geth_tx, that way I was trying to avoid stale interrupts. That
helped to increase an overall performance (not only responsiveness),
but as I said my approach didn't pass the tests.
I don't really think that your patch may cause this, but can you
try netperf w/ this patch applied anyway? And see if it really
doesn't cause any issues under stress?
Thanks,
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-25 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-25 13:30 [PATCH] ucc_geth: Move freeing of TX packets to NAPI context Joakim Tjernlund
2009-03-25 14:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-25 15:16 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-03-25 21:42 ` David Miller
2009-03-25 21:40 ` David Miller
2009-03-25 21:55 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-03-25 14:25 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2009-03-25 15:21 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-03-25 17:51 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-03-30 8:34 ` Li Yang
2009-03-30 9:21 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-03-30 9:36 ` Li Yang
2009-03-30 10:01 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-03-30 10:24 ` Li Yang
2009-03-30 20:36 ` David Miller
2009-03-25 21:39 ` David Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-04-17 22:03 Anton Vorontsov
2009-04-21 9:07 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090325142540.GA20944@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
--to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se \
--cc=leoli@freescale.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).