linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Jeff Haran" <jharan@Brocade.COM>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Dave Jiang <djiang@mvista.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Doug Thompson <dougthompson@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: bug in drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c:mpc85xx_mc_check() ?
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:47:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090410144715.0fa5939e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57AC2FA1761300418C7AB8F3EA493C9702C5F200@HQ-EXCH-5.corp.brocade.com>

(cc's added)

On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 14:57:42 -0700
"Jeff Haran" <jharan@Brocade.COM> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Recent versions of this function start off with:
> 
> static void mpc85xx_mc_check(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
> {
>     struct mpc85xx_mc_pdata *pdata = mci->pvt_info;
>     ...
> 
>     err_detect = in_be32(pdata->mc_vbase + MPC85XX_MC_ERR_DETECT);
>     if (err_detect)
>         return;
> 
>     ...
> }
> 
> My reading of the Freescale 8548E Manual leads me to conclude that the
> Memory Error Detect register (ERR_DETECT) will have various bits set if
> the memory controller has detected an error since the last time it was
> cleared. If no memory error has occurred, the register will contain 0.
> 
> Perhaps I am missing something very basic, but it seem to me that the
> above "if" should be:
> 
>     if (!err_detect)
>         return;
> 
> as the existing code would seem to read "if any errors have occurred,
> ignore them", though perhaps testing has demonstrated that the Freescale
> manual is in error.
> 
> Please include this email address in responses as I do not subscribe.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jeff Haran
> Brocade

       reply	other threads:[~2009-04-10 21:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <57AC2FA1761300418C7AB8F3EA493C9702C5F200@HQ-EXCH-5.corp.brocade.com>
2009-04-10 21:47 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-04-13 17:10   ` bug in drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c:mpc85xx_mc_check() ? Dave Jiang
     [not found] <57AC2FA1761300418C7AB8F3EA493C9702E319DB@HQ-EXCH-5.corp.brocade.com>
2009-04-29  7:37 ` bug in drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c:mpc85xx_mc_check() Andrew Morton
2009-04-29 12:46   ` Kumar Gala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090410144715.0fa5939e.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=djiang@mvista.com \
    --cc=dougthompson@xmission.com \
    --cc=jharan@Brocade.COM \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).