From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ovro.ovro.caltech.edu (ovro.ovro.caltech.edu [192.100.16.2]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D1CDDF9B for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:53:44 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:53:42 -0700 From: Ira Snyder To: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [RFC v2] virtio: add virtio-over-PCI driver Message-ID: <20090414215342.GB9877@ovro.caltech.edu> References: <20090224000002.GA578@ovro.caltech.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Jan-Bernd Themann , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 02:28:26PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Ira Snyder wrote: > > This adds support to Linux for using virtio between two computers linked by > > a PCI interface. This allows the use of virtio_net to create a familiar, > > fast interface for communication. It should be possible to use other virtio > > devices in the future, but this has not been tested. > > Hey Ira, > > I like this a lot. I need to do much the same thing on one of my > platforms, so I'm going to use your patch as my starting point. Have > you made many changes since you posted this version of your patch? > I'd like to collaborate on the development and help to get it > mainlined. > This would be great. I'd really appreciate the help. I haven't had time to make any changes since I last posted the patch. I started work on converting all of the usage of struct vop_loc_* to just use the on-wire structures, but I didn't get very far before other work got in the way. > In my case I've got an MPC5200 as the 'host' and a Xilinx Virtex > (ppc440) as the 'client'. I intend set aside a region of the Xilinx > Virtex's memory space for the shared queues. I'm starting work on it > now, and I'll provide you with feedback and/or patches as I make > progress. > I'm looking forward to seeing your implementation. If you have any questions, I'd be happy to attempt to answer them :) Ira