linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Ted Peters <ted.peters@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Add P2020DS board support
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:54:47 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090415175447.GA17134@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5F3E22A9-AC7D-4066-B861-C98755BAE4A8@kernel.crashing.org>

On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:22:48PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Apr 15, 2009, at 11:50 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>
>>
>> Sorry for bringing this up again... But can we decide on soc's
>> compatible scheme and finally remove the device_type = "soc"
>> for new boards? "fsl,p2020-soc", "fsl,soc", "simple-bus" maybe?
>>
>> Thanks,
>
> We can, but I don't want to couple the two issues. If someone wants to 
> work and post patches related to this issue I'm all for it.

I posted it in 2008:

http://www.mail-archive.com/linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org/msg14311.html

Do we agree on "fsl,<cpu>-{immr,ccsr}", "fsl,{immr,ccsr}", "fsl,soc",
"simple-bus"?

IIRC you didn't like "fsl,soc" in general and asked for more
discussion:

http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-January/050753.html

And from time to time I'm just trying to provoke this discussion.

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2

      reply	other threads:[~2009-04-15 17:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-15 15:49 [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Add P2020DS board support Kumar Gala
2009-04-15 15:59 ` Timur Tabi
2009-04-15 16:17   ` Kumar Gala
2009-04-15 16:50 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-04-15 17:22   ` Kumar Gala
2009-04-15 17:54     ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090415175447.GA17134@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
    --to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=ted.peters@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).